Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Norma Hornby's avatar

Although in my experience Buckingham Palace was looking rather weary in terms of worn carpets and decor, this palace is really steeped in history. Magnificent mahogany boxed WCs and a great number of framed paintings by significant artists, the gardens were beautiful too. Well worth the visit although Windsor Castle is still my favourite.

Expand full comment
Anne Moore Hutton's avatar

I think Queen Elizabeth got it right about the monarchy: it has to remain mysterious and somewhat aloof to retain its position politically, as well as "seen to be believed." Look at some of the Scandinavian monarchies. They have lost much of their power (and their interest to the public) by being too ordinary. In fact, much of Britain's remaining power and position in the world is due to the longevity of its monarchial system, which does wield a subtle, if symbolic power. That's what's so fascinating about the British Monarchy to us, in the US, anyway. Buckingham Palace is above all a symbol of the British monarchy around the world and the events that take place there are so extraordinary. It's a really impressive PALACE. That said, do I think the royals must actually live there? No. Let them have their private domestic places and enjoy Highgrove, Clarence House, Anmer Hall, Forest Lodge, and certainly Balmoral. They do deserve a real life behind all the symbolism. PS I have spent a considerable time in Scotland, which I love, and although I have never been there, my favorite palace is Balmoral--private and symbolic!

Expand full comment

No posts